Learn More

 
Skip to main content
Koch Agronomic Services Logo
SolutionsKnowledge CenterAboutRetailers & Reps
Labels / SDS
Contact
Labels / SDS
Contact
US
USCAINT
Map of the World

Find a Rep or Retailer

With our network of knowledgeable representatives, retailers and distributors, you can be confident you will get the best solution for your unique needs. Find your nearest Koch Agronomic Services, LLC, representative.

 
Contact Us
Find a Rep or Retailer

Connect with Koch Agronomic Services

Facebook IconLinkdein IconTwitter IconYouTube Icon
Koch logo

Solutions

AGROTAIN™PHOSFORCE™WOLF TRAX™PROTIVATE™ANVOL™OPTRIENT™CENTURO™SUPERU™
Knowledge CenterPodcastsResearch & ReportsArticlesProduct Labels/SDSs
AboutPress ReleasesCareers
Retailers & RepsFind a Rep or Retailerpage links
US
USCAINT
Koch Logo

Privacy Policy · Do Not Sell or Share My Personal Information · California Supply Chain Transparency · Modern Slavery Statement · Terms of Use · Patent Information

AGROTAIN™, the AGROTAIN logo, ANVOL™, the ANVOL logo, CENTURO™, the CENTURO logo, ARMOUR™, the ARMOUR logo, OPTRIENT™, the OPTRIENT logo, N-TEGRATION™, the N-TEGRATION logo, SUPERU™, and the SUPERU logo, TRIBUNE™, the TRIBUNE logo, SYNTHOS™, the SYNTHOS logo, NUTRICARE™, the NUTRICARE logo, WOLF TRAX™, the WOLF TRAX logo, PROTIVATE™, the PROTIVATE logo, 3-TRAX™, DDP™, CROP MIX™, NU-TRAX™ and EVENCOAT™ are trademarks of Koch Agronomic Services, LLC. Koch, the Koch logo and Principle Based Management™ are trademarks of Koch IP Holdings, LLC. © 2025 Koch Agronomic Services, LLC. All Rights Reserved.

1. EPA EEF Challenge Submission data: 30% reduction - corn (Chatterjee et al, 2016); 34% reduction - corn (Chatterjee et al, 2016); 45% reduction - corn (Yang et al, 2016); 35% reduction - corn (Eagle et al, 2017); 48% reduction - irrigated no-till corn (Halvorson et al, 2010); 53% reduction - semi-arid irrigated corn (Dugan et al, 2017); 43.8% reduction - sandy loam soil (Awale and Chatterjee, 2017).

The data and material contained herein are provided for informational purposes only. No warranty, express or implied, is made including, but not limited to, implied warranties of merchantability and fitness for a particular purpose, which are specifically excluded. Results may vary based on a number of factors, including environmental conditions. Before use, consult the product packaging and labeling for information regarding the product's characteristics, uses, safety, efficacy, hazards and health effects.

Not all products may be available in your jurisdiction.

CENTURO is not registered for sale or use in all jurisdictions. In the United States, contact your state pesticide regulatory agency to determine if a product is registered for sale or use in your state. Results may vary based on a number of factors, including environmental conditions. Improvements in nutrient use efficiency, yield and nitrate leaching may not be observed in all cases.

PROTIVATE NU5-LUX is not available for sale, use or distribution in California.

image
 

Latest Resources

SPREADERArticle3 Factors to Consider When Selecting an Enhanced Efficiency Fertilizertractor in fieldArticleCombating Nitrogen Loss: A Dual-Action Approach to UAN Stabilizationfertilizer in a trailerArticleExperts Answer Top Questions on Smarter Phosphorus Managementgrower looking at a handful of treated seed ArticleThe Spring Seed Enhancement Guide: 3 Things to Know Before You Plant wolf trax treated fertilizer in semi trailerArticleThe Evolution of WOLF TRAX™ DDP™ Micronutrients and What It Means for Growers

December 21, 2023

UAN Application Method Impact on Ammonia Volatilization Losses

Half of the nitrogen in UAN is derived from urea and is highly subject to volatilization loss. A quarter of the nitrogen in UAN is in the ammonium form, which can be lost as ammonia in the presence of active urea hydrolysis. Using a urease inhibitor with UAN can prevent volatilization loss and provide positive return on investment. 

University of Georgia recently published a study evaluating ammonia volatilization losses from nitrogen applied as dribbled UAN, broadcast UAN, and broadcast urea on tall fescue and bermudagrass forage. Nitrogen losses due to ammonia volatilization ranged from 5 – 20 percent across all methods of application. The amount of nitrogen loss was dependent on environmental conditions, including soil water content, soil temperature, and rainfall.  

Dribbled UAN consistently lost less nitrogen than broadcast UAN. Nitrogen losses from broadcast urea were highest when applications were made to moist soil. Volatilization losses were higher when soil temperature was warmer. Perhaps the most intriguing outcome was that at least as much and sometimes more nitrogen was lost from broadcast UAN than broadcast urea.
 

 

The results are clear: UAN is subject to appreciable ammonia volatilization loss and should be managed accordingly, to not only decrease losses to the environment but improve agronomic efficiency. Utilizing a urease inhibitor such as ANVOL™ nitrogen stabilizer or AGROTAIN™ nitrogen stabilizer, can help reduce the risk of nitrogen loss with UAN.

In a study conducted by North Dakota State University, approximately 25 percent of total nitrogen applied as untreated UAN was lost to ammonia volatilization 14 days after application, compared to AGROTAIN treated UAN, where losses to volatilization was 12 percent. 
 

It’s safe to say an UAN investments shouldn’t be left to the chances of weather – protect your nitrogen with a Koch Agronomic Services solution.

Cabrera, M.L., Franklin, D.H. & Kissel, D.E. Method of Applying UAN Affects Ammonia Volatilization Losses. The Fluid Journal, Vol. 26, No. 4 (2018).
 

Resource Categories
Spring FertilizerANVOLAGROTAINArticleNutrient Protection